Parties To The Nauru Agreement Website

Apr 11, 2021 by     No Comments    Posted under: Uncategorized

The development of the agreement is being developed by many tuna conservation and management instruments currently in use in the region. These include the sliding seine and longline fishing day system and fisheries, as well as the Fisheries Information Management System (FIMS). These include obtaining the Marine Stewardship Council`s first certification in the region and the corresponding creation of the Pacific Tuna Marketing Brand. At last week`s meeting of ANP ministers in Palau, the Tokel and the parties to the Nauru Agreement (PNA) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) allowing the South Pacific territory to accede to the FSM agreement (FSMA), an agreement that allows the agreed parties under the agreement to access other fisheries resources. He said: “How many times do we put all interested people in a space on the same platform with the same ability to speak freely?… Let`s start with the conversation about the regional orientation of all mobile parties… to talk about EM…. I hope that at the end of this symposium we will be more informed and inspired… Implement EM programs.¬†Based on this agreement, the same states generated $500 million in revenue in 2019. The Nauru Agreement on Cooperation in Fisheries Management of Common Interest or the Nauru Agreement is a sub-regional oceanic agreement between the Federated States of Micronesia, Kiribati, the Marshall Islands, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Densalomonen and Tuvalu. [2] The eight signatories together control 25-30% of the world`s tuna supply and about 60% of the tuna supply in the western and central Pacific.

[3] If we calculate the business too much, then we can actually prevent them from fishing, so we have to weigh that and the more we calculate, it`s like it`s money you take from the pockets of the parties if you can help reduce those fees they pay more to the parties… We need to broaden the base,” he said. Dr. Aqorau recounts the first discussions on the agreement and the opposition, the challenges and the victories along the way. “From the beginning, the parties do not contribute to the office, the office is commercial, they do not contribute to the support of the ANP office, we have always collected our money from a percentage of the (fishing) day that is exchanged by the office, but our programs have expanded, so let`s now see how we can raise money – we can`t continue to overwhelm the fishing boats. He pointed out that the trade in fishing days between ANP members and the pooling of days to allow fishing vessels access to several areas, which increases the selling value of the fishing day, all work. For most ANP countries, tuna is the main source of income and often the only main source of income. Today, however, only a very small part of the economic benefits of tuna return to ANP countries. Given that certified tuna results in a significant price increase, it is understandable that ANP countries should have an interest in keeping their communities more valuable.

Comments are closed.